|
#1
Nov 4, 2009, 02:54 AM
|
|
Hello together,
can you tell me what I do wrong?
On my computer with Firefox 3.5.4 looks the website good but other tell me there are many different faults in it.
HD-Wolle & Lifestyle
I hope you can help me.
Best Wishes,
Markus Dunkel
|
#2
Nov 4, 2009, 04:20 AM
|
|
What kind of problems are they having? It's showing up aligned correctly and looking pretty uniform for me in FF and IE8.
|
#3
Nov 4, 2009, 05:41 AM
|
|
|
|
23,765 posts · Mar 2009
OSX 10.11.5 WP 4.x Atahualpa(all) Safari, Firefox, Chrome
|
|
looks fine in Safari. Girl_Genius is right, if you have a problem you have to be more specific. No-one but you knows what it should look like, so how could anyone else know if something is wrong or that is the way you wanted it to be?
__________________
"Tell me and I forget, teach me and I may remember, involve me and I learn." - Benjamin Franklin
Juggledad | Forum Moderator/Support
|
#4
Nov 4, 2009, 07:36 AM
|
|
Thanks for your answers.
e.g. on the right sidebar the newsletter form.
The fields should be different in the width and I don't know how I can style it a little bit better as it is now.
How are the h2-text? Not to big for the website? Sometimes they need two lines and not one.
|
#5
Nov 4, 2009, 07:47 AM
|
|
|
|
1,333 posts · Feb 2009
Wordpress 3.4.1, Atahualpa 3.7.7
|
|
The newsletter fields look good. They are the same width. Why do you want them different widths?
I think the H2 headlines are OK, but maybe H3 would look better.
|
#6
Nov 4, 2009, 07:58 AM
|
|
Sorry I have written it wrong.
Somebody have say me, that the newsletter fields look different in the width in some browsers. But I think this person are wrong because here are now more people who say that it's right and ok.
Thanks for the tip. I will test it with h3.
And I will thanks all who written here. It's very good to hear that the homepage is ok. Especially, when it is make from a beginner in CSS;HTML and so on...
|
#7
Nov 4, 2009, 08:04 AM
|
|
|
|
23,765 posts · Mar 2009
OSX 10.11.5 WP 4.x Atahualpa(all) Safari, Firefox, Chrome
|
|
remember is could be a issue with the monitor settings the user is using. ie, if I use a monitor set at 1680x1050 I have plenty of space to look at a page, but if the monitor is 800x600 things could get squished. Find out what their settings are.
__________________
"Tell me and I forget, teach me and I may remember, involve me and I learn." - Benjamin Franklin
Juggledad | Forum Moderator/Support
|
#8
Nov 4, 2009, 12:34 PM
|
|
It's the monitor setting which let the website show in little different ways.
The change from h2 to h3 will I do in the next few hours.
But another problem, my external JS is too high (ca. 211 KB) because of some plugins.
Can someone tell me if it is possible to make it thinner?
Sorry about my English
|
#9
Nov 4, 2009, 12:38 PM
|
|
|
|
1,333 posts · Feb 2009
Wordpress 3.4.1, Atahualpa 3.7.7
|
|
Your English is just fine!
I just installed PHP Speedy. It minifies JS and CSS. I think it has speeded up my sites a bit.
|
#10
Nov 4, 2009, 01:26 PM
|
|
Thanks.
Which configuration is the best to use by this plugin?
|
#11
Nov 4, 2009, 07:26 PM
|
|
I installed website optimizer (the free version)
http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/web-optimizer/
and noticed a considerable speed up. It minifies, compresses, caches, etc.
PHP Speedy caused plugin conflicts with javascript but this plugin did not.
|
#12
Nov 5, 2009, 10:10 AM
|
|
@bushtool
I have install the plugin and my website was "damaged" totally.
What I have to configurate in this plugin that it is ok?
|
#13
Nov 5, 2009, 11:28 AM
|
|
|
|
1,333 posts · Feb 2009
Wordpress 3.4.1, Atahualpa 3.7.7
|
|
That plugin ruined my formatting, so I just deactivated and then deleted it. I'm sure there are ways to deal with it, but life is too short, and the WP-Cache plugin is good enough.
|
#14
Nov 8, 2009, 12:56 PM
|
|
Hello,
how I have to configure php speedy that it is correct?
I don't really know how it works, I hope someone can help me.
Update:
Also WP Super Cache, I need tips to configure it, too.
Update 2:
When I'm looking at the queries and loading time of the site, then I'm very shocking.
132 queries and 10,937 seconds. Very much and long time.
How can I male it better?
Last edited by hdwolle; Nov 8, 2009 at 03:31 PM.
|
|